|
| 1.) Abstract
Experience in grinding raw
materials for clinker production has been utilized to apply Loesche mills
for the production of ground granulated blast furnace slag, ordinary portland
cement, slag cement and cement with interground additives.
The newly developed 2+2/3+3
Loesche technology combines proven elements with high reliability in a
new set up of different sized rollers and a recently introduced high efficiency
cage wheel type classifier, which allows fine grinding at high mass related
surface areas without facing extensive vibrations.
The drying capability of
vertical roller mills allows use of moist interground additives such as
granulated blast furnace slag, trass, pozzolana, limestone etc. Extensive
research on product quality during recent years has shown that cements
with interground additives produced in the company's mills easily meet
the consumers' requirements. Water demand, strength development and the
workability of cement mortar as well as of concrete made from cement produced
in the Loesche mill are comparable to or even better than those from conventional
ball mill systems.
|
2.) Introduction
In 1891, the first patent
had been granted world wide for a ball mill. For over 100 years, ball mills
have been the standard equipment for the comminution of raw materials and
products in cement production. Since 1925, vertical roller mills manufactured
by Loesche GmbH have been applied for grinding raw materials, coal and
minerals. In the 70s, vertical roller mills became increasingly dominant
for grinding raw materials for the cement industry due to their high energy
efficiency and excellent drying capability.
In the late 70s, the cement
industry became very conscious of the energy consumption in cement production
and the equipment suppliers
*Based on a paper from the
Proceedings of the Association, Istanbul, Turkey, November 1997.
consequently started to develop
new technologies specially for grinding clinker, slag and other admixtures
to cement. Today, a wide range of grinding technologies is available on
the market.
As one of the leaders in
comminution technology, Loesche GmbH started to develop their raw mills
for grinding clinker and slag more than ten years ago. The result of this
research work was the development of the 2+2 technology. The first mill
of this kind started industrial operation in late 1994, and since then,
this grinding system has established a high position on the market based
on its excellent performance, high flexibility and good operational availability.
|
| 3.) The Loesche 2+2/3+3
design
Mills of the 2+2 design (Figure
1) for grinding clinker, slag and interground additives use mainly the
proven design principles of a vertical roller mill for grinding of raw
materials.
The main difference between
the 2+2 mills and the conventional 4-roller mills for raw material grinding
is that two differently sized pairs of rollers are used. The so called
s-rollers are used to prepare the material bed on the grinding table. These
s-rollers are of a light design and a smaller diameter compared to the
large grinding rollers, the m-rollers. By means of hydraulic attachments,
the small, light s-rollers are positioned at a certain height above the
grinding table, where they slightly consolidate and deaerate the material
bed.
After this preparation,
the material is properly nipped under the large and heavy grinding rollers
of conventional design. The forces required for comminution underneath
the m-rollers are created by means of hydraulic cylinders attached to the
rocker arms of the m-rollers. All m-rollers are supported on individual
stands, which are relocated on the mill foundation. Furthermore, individual
hydropneumatic spring systems for each set of rollers
provide a very smooth and almost vibration free operation of the mill.
The 2+2 system is available for capacities of up to 170 tph OPC. In the
case of higher throughput, the 3+3 system is used, which consists of three
s-rollers and three m-rollers.
As no grinding force is applied
on the s-rollers, their tyres can be made of a simple steel sheet design.
On the m-rollers, tyres of high, wear-resistant chromium castings are installed,
and hardfacing can provide additional wear protection.
Market demands led to the
development of a new separator incorporated in the mill housing. Today,
a high efficiency cage-wheel-type classifier is installed in Loesche mills.
Many design features of the
company's raw material mills have been incorporated in the mills for clinker
and slag grinding. Due to the modular design of the mills, grinding rollers
of different sizes can be installed in the same mill housing, thus providing
a wide range of production capacity.
Figure 1. Roller
grinding mill with classifier LSKS.
|
4.) Slag and clinker
grinding plants with Loesche mills
The design of grinding plants
with the 2+2 mills is extremely simple (Figure 2). Slag, clinker and interground
additives are collected from the mill feed bins by means of weigh feeders
and transported to the mill inlet. A lifting magnet and a metal detector
are used to prevent tramp metal and other foreign matter being fed into
the mill.
A hydraulically operated
triple gate is used as an air seal at the mill inlet. The feed material
is dried and ground simultaneously in the mill. After it has passed over
the grinding table and after comminution underneath the m-rollers, the
material leaves the grinding table and is lifted by the air flow to the
high efficiency separator. The product leaves the mill together with the
air flow while the rejects are returned to the centre of the grinding table
for further comminution.
The particle size distribution
of the product can be influenced by adjustments in the speed of the separator
rotor, of the air flow and of the grinding pressure. A jet pulse filter
is installed downstream of the Loesche mill where the product is collected.
The system fan of the circuit
is installed behind the jet pulse filter. The VVVF drive of the system
fan allows an adjustment of the air flow according to the requirement of
the circuit. Depending on the mode of operation, the air can be recirculated
to the mill or discarded through the stack. A hot gas generator can be
connected to the recirculation duct and can be used as a hot gas source
in case of drying of moist feed materials such as granulated blast furnace
slag, pozzolana or other moist interground additives. If other sources
of hot gases like cooler waste gas or preheater waste gas are available,
they might be used as a hot gas source as well. An intake for ambient air
can be used for controlling the product temperature.
Granulated blast furnace
slag additionally contains certain amounts of metallic iron in the range
of 1 % and 3%, which accumulates on the grinding table during grinding.
These 'iron particles are discharged from the grinding table and fall down
into the hot gas channel in the lower part of the mill. From there, they
are reclaimed by scrapers and discharged from the mill housing through
one opening. Together with the metallic iron, small amounts of feed material
are extracted as well. This reject material is lifted by means of a bucket
elevator to a hopper, from which it is extracted in a controlled flow.
In slag grinding
plants, the reject passes over a magnetic drum separator, which separates
the magnetic iron from the rest of the reject material. The iron is collected
separately in a container, while the rest of the reject is fed back into
the mill together with the feed material. This arrangement reduces the
wear on the tyres of the grinding rollers and the lining of the grinding
table considerably.
The entire grinding plant
can be arranged in a layout as a very compact design (Figure 3). The mill
itself is located on ground level as well as the system air fan. Only the
jet pulse filter requires a steel structure for its support. The whole
grinding circuit is completely enclosed. The material
transport inside the grinding
circuit itself takes place in closed ducts and no conveying equipment is
required, which might need an attendance during operation or might need
maintenance. The grinding plant does not need any building structure and
can be set up in the open air. Compared to other grinding systems, the
noise level of the grinding plants with Loesche mills is extremely low.
Figure
2. Flow sheet of a slag grinding plant with a LOESCHE Mill
Figure
3: Slag grinding plant with a LM 46.2+2S
|
| 5.) Grinding of granulated
blast furnace slag
The excellent drying capacity
of these mills makes it a useful tool for grinding granulated blast furnace
slag. Moisture contents of 15% or even more are acceptable.
In isolated grinding plants,
hot gas generators are generally used as a heat source. If the grinding
plant is installed close to a kiln cooler, waste gas might be used as hot
gas source as well. In the application of a hot gas, generator fuel with
a low sulfur content should be used as high sulfur contents may cause corrosion
in the jet pulse filter when temperatures below the dew point of sulfuric
acid are observed during start-up or shutdown of the plant.
The comminution efficiency
of grinding of granulated blast furnace slag of the company's mills is
good. An installation with a production capacity of 60 tph ground granulated
blast furnace slag with a mass related surface of 4.300 cm2/g according
to Blaine requires a specific power consumption of approximately 36 kWh/t
for the Loesche mill, the separator and the mill system fan (Table 1).
Compared to a conventional close circuit ball mill system, 54% of the power
can be saved in this particular case. The pressure drop over the Loesche
mills in the case of slag grinding is extremely low compared to grinding
of raw materials. Pressure drops between 320 daPa and 380 daPa have been
monitored over long production periods.
Table
3: Strength development of CEM I
(mortar test
EN196) produced in different grinding systems
Table 4: Strength
development of CEM II/A-L
(mortar test
EN196) produced in different grinding systems
|
6.) Production of cement with interground
additives
The European Standard EN
197 allows the production of a wide range of cements with interground additives
(Table 2). Cement plants which can utilize the whole range of allowable
interground additives according to EN 197 can lower their specific power
consumption per t of sold product significantly and can simultaneously
increase the yearly production rate.
In ball mill systems, which
are not designed for drying operation, the production capacity drops significantly
in case the moisture of the mill feed increases above 1%. Numerous ball
mills world-wide suffer from 20% or even 30% decrease of their production
capacity due to the fact that moist pozzolanas, trass or slag is added.
Under these conditions, these mills are operated at a very high temperature
level resulting in the disadvantage of high product temperatures. Provided
that sufficient hot gases are available, the Loesche mills are not sensitive
to variations in the mill feed moisture. Therefore, it is ideal for the
production of cement with interground additives with a high moisture content
such as granulated blast furnace slag, pozzolana, trass or even moist fly
ash.
Intergrinding of clinker
with additives of different grindability in ball mills leads to overgrinding
of softer particles. However, the more difficult grindable components can
be found in the coarser fraction of the particle size distribution of the
cement. This is the result of the similar retention type of softer and
harder particles in the grinding
bed of a ball mill. In this respect, conditions are different in a Loesche
Mill. Once the individual particles have passed over the grinding table
and under a grinding roller, they are transported immediately to the high
efficiency separator at the top of the mill. Particles of the size defined
as products leave the mill immediately. No overgrinding happens in Loesche
mills. However, this does not influence the product quality. Numerous tests
of setting behaviour and strength development of cements with interground
additives used in a Loesche mill and the comparison with the same type
of cement produced in a ball mill have shown that in both systems the same
quality level at the same mass related fineness could be achieved easily.
Some typical examples are shown below.
Table 3 shows the comparison
of CEM 1 according to EN 197. No interground additives have been used.
In this case, a high mass related surface area was required which could
be managed easily.
Table 1: Power consumption
for grinding of 60 tph blast furnace slag with 4.300cm²/g
|
|
Ball Mill
|
LOESCHE Mill
|
| Mill |
4.400 kW
|
1.560 kW
|
| Separator |
100 kW
|
70 kW
|
| Fan |
180 kW
|
550 kW
|
| Total |
4.720 kW
|
2.180 kW
|
| Specific |
78,7 kWh/t
|
36,3 kWh/t
|
| Saving |
|
- 54%
|
The use of interground limestone
is very common in many countries for cements which will be used for nonstructural
buildings or for the production of binders of all kinds. Table 4 shows
the comparison of strength development of such a cement produced in a ball
mill and a vertical roller mill.
The addition of pozzolana
or trass is a very common practice in many countries. Table 5 gives the
results of a comparative study with a pozzolana cement. Such cements are
usually ground to higher surface areas than OPCs which can be done quite
well in Loesche mills. As pozzolanas are usually fairly moist materials,
the drying capability of a Loesche mill is a further advantage to the producer.
Table 2: Cement
types acc. EN 197
| Cement Type |
Allowable |
Aditive |
| CEM IV...-S |
6-35% |
Granulated Blast Furnace
Slag |
| CEM IIV...-S |
36-95^% |
Granulated Blast Furnace
Slag |
| CEM IV...-V |
6-35% |
Fly ash |
| CEM IV...-P |
6-35% |
Pozzolana, Trass |
| CEM IV...-L |
6-35% |
Limestone |
| CEM IV...-M |
6-35 |
Pozzolana, limestone, slag,
fly ash, process dust |
| CEM IV |
11-55% |
Pozzolana, fly ash |
| CEM V |
60-80% |
Slag, pozzolana, fly ash |
The comparison in Table 6
shows a fly ash cement. Fly ash is currently available from coal fired
power plants. Production of fly ash cement can be considered an environmentally
friendly step towards intelligent recycling of this by-product.
Although the retention time
of the material in a Loesche mill is between three and four minutes, a
dehydration of gypsum takes place. Compared to a ball mill, the degree
of dehydration of gypsum in cements with low mass related surface areas
is less in cements used in a Loesche mill, but on higher mass related finenesses
(e.g. 4.000 cm2/g and higher), the same degree of dehydration in ball mill
cements and cements produced in vertical roller mills has been observed.
However, it is necessary to adjust the percentage of the sulfate carrier
in accordance with the desired setting behaviour in case of the application
of a vertical roller mill individually.
When introducing the 2+2
technology to the market three years ago, most customers requested that
the cements produced
in the mill should have approximately the same particle size distribution
as the cements produced in conventional close circuit ball mills. Contrary
to other technologies brought into the market in recent years, this target
could be achieved easily. By adjustment
of the process parameters, it was possible to achieve an even less inclined
slope of the particle size distribution than obtained in ball mill systems,
if required. In the meantime, it was recognized that in many countries
low mass related surface areas are requested but steep particle size distributions
are desired. Due to the installation of the high efficiency separator,
this target can be easily achieved.
Comprehensive tests with
cements with interground additives from various sources all over the world
proved that the workability of the cements produced in a Loesche mill is
better than the workability of cements produced from the same raw materials
in other grinding systems. This statement is valid for the workability
of concrete as well, which seems to be a great advantage for cement manufacturers
who supply ready mix plants or plants which manufacture prefabricated concrete
structures.
|
| 7.) To mix or not to mix no question
After close circuit roller
press systems for finish grinding had been introduced into the market,
the installation of mixing plants for the production of blended cements
became a common technology. In comparison to the operation of a ball mill,
the power saving by application of roller press systems for slag grinding
only is significantly high.
Therefore, separate
grinding of the individual components reduces the energy demand for cement
production.
Figure 4: Capacity
increase and reduction in power consumption on intergrinding of additives
like Trass, slag, pozzolana and limestone.
Experience in the operation
of Loesche mills for the production of cements with interground additives
has shown that combined grinding of clinker and additives such as slag,
trass or limestone increases the production capacity of the mill and reduces
the specific energy consumption (Figure 4). This statement is valid not
only for high percentages of additives, but even for small rates between
5% and 10%. For this reason, combined grinding is recommended when Loesche
mills are installed. Changing from one type of cement to another can be
achieved within a very short period. Due to the extremely low retention
time in the vertical roller mill, the amount of intermediate cements is
almost zero.
However, switching over from
grinding pure CEM 1 to grinding granulated blast furnace slag or trass
is easy.
Grinding of the components
to different mass related surface areas and a later mixing of the components
increases the flexibility of the plant and allows fast response to the
market demand.
The decision of whether to
mix or to intergrind must be based mainly on the sales strategy of the
cement manufacturer.
|
8.) Conclusion
The 2+2/3+3 technology developed
by Loesche GmbH for the grinding of slag and cement with interground additives
offers high flexibility in the production of a wide range of different
cements in one single production unit. Furthermore, low energy consumption,
minimized costs for civil constructions as well as a high reliability and
high operational availability make this system an ideal grinding tool.
|
|